One of Pennsylvania’s leading legal entities is required to return internal war documents on the so-called “skill game.” As a result of last week’s federal judge’s decision, game maker Paes-O-Matic deserves full access to the material to move forward with a case involving double-dealing in his job of locking machines from the state gambling market.

Paes-o-Matic says because he had appointed Pittsburgh-based Eckert Simmons Cherin and Melot to represent in Virginia, it was inappropriate and possible to work with ParxCasino at the same time in Parx’s bid to oppose commercial casino companies near Pennsylvania. The spread of skill games in convenience stores, bars and other places here in recent years.

Ruling on July 5 in favor of Pace-O-Matic, District Judge Jennifer Wilson ordered the law firm to share more than 180 emails, texts and other documents, Pace-O-Matic believes it will support their claim against the firm.

Eckert Simmons, a leading law firm with more than 300 lawyers in cities including Philadelphia, Harrisburg and Pittsburgh and Washington DC, has been representing Paes-O-Matic in Virginia since 2016. But it has a long-standing relationship with Parks, whose Bucks County facility is the largest of Pennsylvania’s commercial casinos.

After Paes-O Matic, according to his court records, realized that Eckert’s lawyers were working to some extent for Parks in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court case, his officials asked Eckert Simmons to step down to settle the legality of his skill game. From any representation of Parks in January 2020.

The law firm chose to end its work with Pace-O-Matic instead.

“Make no mistake about it, Eckert was involved in a huge conflict of interest where he unethically pitted one client against another,” Pace-O-Matic’s chief public affairs officer Michael Barley said in a statement highlighting the decision on Monday. “This case and the record are clear, and we hope Court Eckert and his agents have harmed the POM, its customers, and countless Pennsylvanians.”

Problem games have the look and feel of a slot machine, but their makers say that unlike slots in casinos, their games are not entirely dependent on opportunity. Instead, they need a level of human skill or ability that some people can actually develop through practice to win players and get payouts.

Pennsylvania state police, commercial casino operators and Pennsylvania lottery officials have taken a turn in recent years to challenge the legality of pay-o-matic and other skill games, gaming equipment operating outside state-licensed casinos and avoiding both consumer protection. Rules and state taxes.

But a web of conflicting and incomplete litigation – including an appellate court battle over machine confiscation that gives rise to a Pace-O-Matic complaint against Eckert – has so far thwarted widespread enforcement efforts against the new machines as they are rooted in thousands of machines. Separate convenience stores, gas stations, pizza parlors and supermarkets.

In Paes-O-Matic’s extensive lawsuit, Eckert and his gaming practice co-chairman Mark Stewart have claimed in the Commonwealth Court that he “actively participated in and prosecuted the case in a way that was contrary to the interests of the POM”; And took part in a campaign aimed at “destroying POM’s business by trying to convince elected and appointed public officials that POM’s games are gambling equipment that should be confiscated and outlawed.”

Pace-O-Matic’s indictment documents will help them detail the level of Stewart’s cooperation with other attorneys from December 2019 to at least February 2020. Legal briefings, legal analysis with state attorneys representing the Pennsylvania State Police, preparation. Recruitment of other casino companies for verbal argument and battle.

Penlive contacted Stewart and his law firm for the report but received no response.

In his legal defense, however, Eckert Simmons argued that his attorneys had never actively represented Parks in a pending Commonwealth Court case, but were being consulted by other companies, and that most of the documents in question were just to prepare to transfer Eckert to other companies. Representation off.

But Wilson, U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Saporito, while confirming the early November 2021 ruling on the documents, said she could not reconcile with Eckert’s assertion that he did not formally represent Parks in the Skill Games case and should have documents in question with follow-up arguments. Yet the power of attorney will be protected as a product.

“It is fundamentally inconsistent to say that Eckert does not represent Parks in the Commonwealth Court of Appeals, but still to claim the privilege of Parks’ attorney-client with respect to documents produced during the Commonwealth Court’s trial. Are doing, ”Wilson said.

The built-in skill game has powerful interests on both sides of the battle.

On one side are game makers, operators, and the establishments they do business with – membership-based social clubs, bars and taverns that are frozen out of Pennsylvania’s growing gambling pie. Skills games have a bright spot in the machine-leasing market that was once built on jukeboxes and video entertainment games, which have been destroyed by smart phones and other changes in the entertainment world in recent years, he says.

They stand up against Pennsylvania’s licensed casinos, angry that skill games run without imposing a 34 percent gaming tax on their slot machine profits; And the Pennsylvania Lottery, whose directors have consistently argued that the skill game is a current and future threat to the lottery’s sales growth, and by extension, its support for senior programs.

In the ongoing fraud case in federal court, Paes-O-Matic alleges that Eckert “violated his most basic credential duties and concealed and misrepresented physical facts to the great detriment of the POM.”

The company is looking for “appropriate damages.”